@i5maybe - You have explained that your particular 'thing' about EV ownership is pretty much focused on how many miles per kWh you can achieve. To the extent of deliberating about buying a car that might not be able to match the figures that you have seen recently. And that's despite comparing apples with oranges over car size.
I tend to view such matters from a different perspective. Here in the UK I drive my Ioniq 5 AWD exactly as I have always driven my cars. I don't even consider whether the car is managing 3.5 or 4.8 or even 5.2 miles per kWh. It is what it is after any one drive whether thats in winter with horizontal rain up a mountain, or a bimble through English villages in summer. Again, it is what it is. And I'm unconcerned about the bald figures. Much of this comes from a previous life when I was involved in shaving pennies from processes.
I can't help applying costs to changes in methods.
For instance. Over 3000 miles, a car achieving a decent average of 3.5 miles per kWh would need 857 kWhs. And a car managing an excellent 5.2 miles per kWh would only use 577 kWhs.
That's a min and max figure for almost all modern EVs. The difference between superb efficiency and normal over the 3000 miles mentioned is 857-577 = 280 kWhs. I use an overnight tariff that costs me 6.7p per kWh here in the UK, and almost all of my mileage is at that figure. So, the difference between excellence and normal is 280kWh @ 6.7p = £18.76.
Now, I realise that to some people, striving for an excellent economy is a cross between a good game and a fixation. But really? Less than $20 in three months. $7 a month. 20c a day? And that's the maximum difference between superb economy and OK? Made even more ironic when someone is prepared to spend $shedloads on changing rims and tyres in an effort to shave off another 0.1 figure from the average m/kWh.
Just buy the damn car. And drive it he same way that you have always driven cars. Then live with the figures, even if they are a tad lower than you managed in a smaller and lighter car.