Hyundai IONIQ Forum banner
21 - 40 of 120 Posts
The 2025 Ioniq 6 SE RWD with 18" wheels has a quoted range of 342 miles vs the SEL/Limited RWD with 20" wheels which have a quoted range of 291 miles.

Why? It seems a combination of the lower weight, narrower 225 tire and better rolling resistance makes a significant difference for the 18" wheels.

I am still surprised that the 19" wheels on our Ioniq 5 makes enough difference to overcome the lower vehicle weight and better vehicle aerodynamics of our Ioniq 6 with 20" wheels (both are 245 tire size).

A long, long time ago I also got a Physics degree and in the end real world data is the reality check

There is an old 2021 video (in Korean with subtitles) in an old thread in these forums with the Ioniq 5 development team where at about 40 minutes there is a discussion of the range (efficiency) of 19" versus 20" wheels. It suggests the 20" performance tires have 15% higher rolling resistance coefficient (and better grip) than 19" tires. However I am not sure how relevant that is to the current Ioniq 5 / 6 18", 19" and 20" tires (do they have the same trade off of grip / rolling resistance)?


View attachment 61683
Rolling resistance! I was thinking about frontal area and completely slipped my mind that a larger contact patch means more rolling resistance. In addition to a bigger contact patch, the rubber might be a different formula as well which would further alter the rolling resistance. Are the 20” tires the same model as the 19” ones? (Michelin Primacy EV is what my 2023 Ioniq 5SEL came with)
 
Discussion starter · #23 ·
Rolling resistance! I was thinking about frontal area and completely slipped my mind that a larger contact patch means more rolling resistance. In addition to a bigger contact patch, the rubber might be a different formula as well which would further alter the rolling resistance. Are the 20” tires the same model as the 19” ones? (Michelin Primacy EV is what my 2023 Ioniq 5SEL came with)
seems to me, as a long lost physicist, that the 'contact patch' is the same for any tire: the number of square inches x the inside pressure divided by 4 has to equal the weight of the car (with, of course, whatever is in it).
 
Discussion starter · #26 ·
Perhaps one of these might help: ev wheel size efficiency - Google Search

Another comparison (from the EPA) to go with Hyundai's estimates: Gas Mileage of 2024 Hyundai Ioniq 6
Outstanding. Thanks. Seems to prove smaller wheel is better for range/efficiency. Am still disturbed by their embarrassing error about wider tire having more contact with the road. The amount of contact is determined by what is necessary to keep the car off the rim, namely, for each wheel, the weight of the car divided by 4 must equal the area in contact x the air pressure inside the tire.
 
Datapoints: 2025 Ioniq6 Limited RWD, 20” wheels. 100mile trip yesterday, primarily Interstate travel in Western North Carolina. Door-to-door consumption for trip was 3.8mi/kWh. Same trip, roughly same weather (sunny, low wind, daytime, dry roads) in our 2025 Ioniq5 Limited RWD 19” wheels = 4.0mi/kWh. All travel at speed limits, mostly 70mph, some 65mph.
Coincidentally, I took a 600+ mi RT from WNC to Roanoke the other day. 3.4mi/kw average as compared to 4+ average on local driving. 2025 Ioniq6 Limited AWD 20” wheels. Between 5-8 over speed limit. Half interstate and half other 4 lane or 2 lane.
 
As a long lost gear head, the statement:
…the 'contact patch' is the same for any tire…
Makes no sense. How can a wider tire not have a larger contact patch? I agree that tires of different diameters and appropriate loading pressure will have a negligible difference in contact patch. But! I assure you from personal experience that a wider tire does have a bigger contact patch resulting in more grip. And more grip is typically a detriment to efficiency.

In a previous post on this thread I pointed out that the larger 20” wheels are also wider (255 width) than the 19” (235 width) and 18” wheels (225 width) fitted to lesser trims and results in a slightly larger frontal area, but forgot how a larger contact patch also likely affects efficiency… probably more than the fraction of a percent increase in frontal area.
 
Discussion starter · #30 ·
According to the head of the design team for the Ioniq 6, they chose 20" wheels because they look cooler.

Great interview on Top Gear if you haven't seen it.

Thanks much, had not seen it. Yes, almost everything now is pointing in the direction that these 'giant' wheels were placed there for aesthetic purposes, and nothing else. Interesting, tho, that while he talks a great deal about the 0.21 drag coefficient, he doesn't mention the LOSS of efficiency due to these large wheels - a compromise they made for looks/sales.
 
Am curious if anyone is getting better than an average of 3.8 miles/KWhr? Have had this Ioniq 6 since Jan 2024, and just took it on our first road trip SF area to LA area. Best I could get, at 65mph set on the SCC with minimal AC, was averaging 3.7. The GOM meter implies something over 4 is not only possible, but ordinary!
(Incidentally, used the Tesla adapter, and it worked perfectly!)
On a nice summer day at 65MPH, our best was 4.1 M/KwH. RWD with 19" aftermarket wheels. Usually just under 4. Wind direction can make a big difference
 
I regularly get between 4-5 M/KwH, but I live in a relatively small town and I rarely drive at over 45 mph. Above that, aerodynamic drag really takes over as the biggest efficiency factor, increasing with the square of velocity. So for any road trip where I am driving at highway speeds, my economy ranges from 3.5 - 4.0 M/KwH. Or less if I'm really booking it or if I have a headwind. And yes, at highway speeds it is the wider tires on your 20" wheels which are giving you an efficiency hit. (also, I spent the first 5 years of my professional career as an Aerodynamics Engineer working at GM's Wind Tunnel in Warren, MI)
 
Am curious if anyone is getting better than an average of 3.8 miles/KWhr? Have had this Ioniq 6 since Jan 2024, and just took it on our first road trip SF area to LA area. Best I could get, at 65mph set on the SCC with minimal AC, was averaging 3.7. The GOM meter implies something over 4 is not only possible, but ordinary!
(Incidentally, used the Tesla adapter, and it worked perfectly!)
My 2024 I6 SEL AWD in ECO mode gets about 4 at that speed in moderate temperatures. I found that tire pressure is critical and temperature of course is a huge factor.

Am curious if anyone is getting better than an average of 3.8 miles/KWhr? Have had this Ioniq 6 since Jan 2024, and just took it on our first road trip SF area to LA area. Best I could get, at 65mph set on the SCC with minimal AC, was averaging 3.7. The GOM meter implies something over 4 is not only possible, but ordinary!
(Incidentally, used the Tesla adapter, and it worked perfectly!)
 
I was confused by this as well. It turns out the 2025 Limited has 20” wheels for the AWD version, but 19” wheels for the RWD. As to efficiency, my understanding is that the tire diameter is the same (the sidewalks are bigger with the 19”.), and the tire is wider in the 20”. Apparently this gives the AWD a sportier feel, better handling on corners and greater rolling resistance. I guess the folks at Hyundai felt that the AWD was appealing to a more performance oriented buyer, and the RWD buyer was more interested in range and efficiency.
 
Are you sure you have 19" wheels? The 2025 Ioniq 6 SEL and Limited have 20" wheels.

3.7 miles / kWh seems about right.

View attachment 61682




That's me.

Yup our 2023 Ioniq 5 SEL AWD with 19" wheels gets 4.1 miles / kWh while our lighter (one less motor), more aerodynamic 2025 Ioniq 6 SEL RWD with 20" wheels 2025 gets 3.8 miles / kWh.

It has been very consistent over many months now with both driven on same roads and in same climate,
The Ioniq 5 Limited 2025 has different wheel sizes for AWD and RWD. 20” vs 19”. As to efficiency, my understanding is that the tire diameter is the same (the sidewalls are bigger with the 19”.), and the tire is wider in the 20”. Apparently this gives the AWD a sportier feel, better handling on corners and greater rolling resistance. I guess the folks at Hyundai felt that the AWD was appealing to a more performance oriented buyer, and the RWD buyer was more interested in range and efficiency.
 
Am curious if anyone is getting better than an average of 3.8 miles/KWhr? Have had this Ioniq 6 since Jan 2024, and just took it on our first road trip SF area to LA area. Best I could get, at 65mph set on the SCC with minimal AC, was averaging 3.7. The GOM meter implies something over 4 is not only possible, but ordinary!
(Incidentally, used the Tesla adapter, and it worked perfectly!)
3 weeks ago I bought a 2025 long range IONIQ 6 SE RWD and drove from Ocala to Gainesville FL averaging 4.4 miles per kWH. I have never reset this and over the total 440 miles driven since purchase, I am averaging 4.9 miles per kWH. I have the engine braking set near the maximum for recharging the battery when de-accelerating. I drove a Polestar 2 in Italy last year and the engine braking was just like my current setting.
 
Am curious if anyone is getting better than an average of 3.8 miles/KWhr? Have had this Ioniq 6 since Jan 2024, and just took it on our first road trip SF area to LA area. Best I could get, at 65mph set on the SCC with minimal AC, was averaging 3.7. The GOM meter implies something over 4 is not only possible, but ordinary!
(Incidentally, used the Tesla adapter, and it worked perfectly!)
I have the 2024 AWD and I consistently get 7.2Km/KWhr (4.5miles/KWhr) with most of my driving around town. That works out to about 550Km or 350 miles range 100% to 0%. Pretty happy with that. I usually charge at home (24A) to 90% and run it down to about 20% before recharging. It does drop maybe 20% or so during the winter season - Nov. to Feb.
 
Discussion starter · #39 ·
3 weeks ago I bought a 2025 long range IONIQ 6 SE RWD and drove from Ocala to Gainesville FL averaging 4.4 miles per kWH. I have never reset this and over the total 440 miles driven since purchase, I am averaging 4.9 miles per kWH. I have the engine braking set near the maximum for recharging the battery when de-accelerating. I drove a Polestar 2 in Italy last year and the engine braking was just like my current setting.
Pretty amazing, you are exceeding almost everyone else in this thread. From Google maps, that stretch, from Ocala to Gainsville, it pretty short, under 40 miles. What was your average speed? Any tailwind? Do you have 20" wheels? Maybe your engine braking is the key - i personally can't stand anything over about 1.0.
 
Physics? I was a physicist (in a former life) and the ONLY way I can see that wheel size plays a role here is mass - and that means any larger wheel has to be less efficient (as it will, perforce, have larger mass). But, I would be happy to hear another argument.
Not a physicists :)

My understanding is that larger wheels mean larger surface area and more friction. That means more energy needed. Plus the mass. Every little bit counts.
 
21 - 40 of 120 Posts